PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (PDT) AFTER IMPLANTATION

Authors

  • Usmonov F.K Tashkent State Dental Institute Author
  • Toychiyev Sh.G. Andijan State Medical Institute Author
  • Toychiyeva D.O. 2nd-year Master’s Student in Therapeutic Dentistry, EMU University Author

Keywords:

photodynamic therapy,, dental implants,, peri-implantitis,, methylene blue,, laser therapy,, bacterial reduction.

Abstract

Background: Post-implant infections and peri-implant mucositis are common complications that can compromise the success of dental implants. Conventional mechanical and chemical decontamination methods often fail to completely eradicate bacterial biofilms. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive technique that uses a photosensitizer and light energy to generate reactive oxygen species capable of destroying microorganisms.

Methods: The study involved 40 patients (22 males, 18 females; aged 25–60 years) who underwent dental implantation. Twenty patients received standard post-implant care (control group), and twenty received additional PDT treatment (test group) using methylene blue (0.01%) activated by a diode laser (660 nm, 100 mW, 90 s per site). Clinical parameters, including probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and bacterial load, were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 8 weeks post-treatment.

Results: PDT significantly reduced peri-implant inflammation and bacterial counts compared to standard therapy. Mean PD decreased from 4.2 ± 0.8 mm to 2.6 ± 0.5 mm, and BOP incidence fell from 65% to 20% at 8 weeks. Microbial analysis revealed a 92% reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis levels.

Conclusion: Photodynamic therapy enhances soft tissue healing and bacterial reduction after implantation. It is a safe, non-invasive adjunctive method for managing peri-implant soft tissue complications and improving long-term implant success.

References

1. De Freitas LM, Colombo FA, Oliveira RR, Rios AC. Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to implant decontamination: a randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(2):379–387.

2. Rios AC, Vieira LC, Freitas A, et al. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of photodynamic therapy on peri-implant mucositis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;38:102814.

3. Soukos NS, Goodson JM. Photodynamic therapy in the control of oral biofilms. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55(1):143–166.

4. Wilson M. Photolysis of oral bacteria and its potential use in the treatment of caries and periodontal disease. J Appl Bacteriol. 2019;67(2):195–210.

5. Chondros P, Reikeras E, Karoussis I, et al. Evaluation of laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(5):437–445.

6. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Salameh Z. Role of laser-based photodynamic therapy in peri-implant diseases: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(3):e1–e10.

7. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Regenerative therapy for peri-implantitis: photodynamic approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(1):59–67.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-25

How to Cite

PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (PDT) AFTER IMPLANTATION. (2025). SOUTH ARAL SEA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1(3), 354-359. https://jurnal.urgfiltma.uz/index.php/SASRSMJ/article/view/89